President Obama visited families of the victims of the Oregon shooting last Friday. There were protest. Why would anyone protest the president visiting families to express his condolences? Why indeed? Because they’re mad the president wants to take away their guns.
The protesters speak of their gun and killing furry animals culture and they believe Obama wants to end that. Obama has actually voiced support for their hunting culture. Usually when one hunts (animals), the weapons of choice are shotguns, rifles, or a bow of some sort, not semi-automatic weapons, so hunters are safe from the prez taking their guns. The president isn’t even trying to take away their semi-automatics.
Yet, they believe the president is coming for their guns. These people are probably the Alabama of Oregon. They’re also upset the president would politicize the shootings, so they stand at the airport and along the road with signs, protesting the politicizing. That’s a head scratcher. Many of the signs also said he needs to go home and back to Kenya. I’m really glad they’re taking a stand on politicizing a crisis. During Friday’s news coverage of the protests, including many interviews, I didn’t see anyone from Fox News, CNN, or MSNBC say “oh by the way, that taking your guns away thing…not happening.”
Meanwhile in Washington, D.C., more fun from the Select Committee on Benghazi. Republican representative Kevin McCarthy swears it’s not a political witch hunt, after he blurbed out it was a political witch hunt designed to destroy Hillary Clinton.
Now a fired investigator for the committee is spilling the beans that it is indeed designed only to destroy Clinton. Many say you can’t take his word because fired people are always upset and try to drag down those who fired him. True. But he is a Republican.
The investigation into Benghazi has so far costs $4.6 million.
The attack on Benghazi resulted in the death of an ambassador, U.S. Foreign Service Information Officer Sean Smith, and two private CIA contractors. Do you know how many private contractors died in Iraq? As of June 20, 2012, 1,569 American contractors have died in Iraq. Where is the outrage? Where are the investigations? Why aren’t we looking for scapegoats?
The president admits he is politicizing gun deaths. He wants change to current gun laws so there will be fewer gun deaths. Will the Benghazi investigation prevent more deaths of Americans on foreign soil? Or is it just designed to destroy one politician the opposing party dislikes?
Conservatives, you have Fox News to assist in your take down of Hillary Clinton. You have Breitbart (if you have a hankering for some racist comments from right wing trolls read the comments under any Breitbart article). You even have that One America Now network (I know nobody watches it but you should visit it one late night for hours of stupid). If nothing else, there’s a gazillion right wing racist trolls on social media to help you. So take the advice from The New York Times editorial page and end your stupid committee. Plus, if Hillary is such an awful candidate, who can’t be elected, who you’ll beat so easily, who’ll eventually destroy herself because she’s untrustworthy, then you don’t need to spend $4.6 million of our money to destroy her.
I really enjoyed your article! If you had the opportunity to change gun laws in America, what would you do, and why?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question. I’ll get into that with my next cartoon because I’ve been meaning to and you just reminded me. Like with immigration, it’s impossible to round up and deport every immigrant here illegally. We also can’t get rid of all the guns. I believe we should go hardcore with a strict registration. Every single gun registered. Every single bullet, shell and ammunition registered and with a background check. I think we should have a permit system for gun ownership and insurance. Gun owners should have to reapply like they would with a drivers license. Eventually, all the guns out there illegally will rise to the surface. It will take decades and time and a lot of that rising will come with crime, unfortunately.
There shouldn’t be a gun sold in this country without a background check.
People have a Constitutional right to gun ownership. But there’s nothing in the Constitution that they are free from being held accountable for ownership.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said! I think most responsible gun owners will agree with you! But how are you going to convince the hardliners? Is the gun lobby is too strong?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would totally support that Clay
LikeLike
The hardliners will never be convinced. At some point a law will be passed and then it’ll be challenged by the Supreme Court. If it passes that then it’ll stand. I’m not sure if that’ll ever happen.
LikeLike